Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Invest Surg ; 33(2): 159-163, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30212230

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The aim of this research is to perform a literature review of the treatments available for the anterior iliac spines avulsion fracture on the young subjects. Material and Methods: We performed a systematic literature search for studies on spines avulsion fractures in young subjects from January 1, 2013, to February 2018; abstracts were screened by a single reviewer. For those studies meeting the eligibility criteria, full-text articles were obtained. Results: From 112 studies found only six articles were included in this systematic review. All the studies belonged to level IV of scientific evidence. 64 patients suffered an anterior inferior iliac spine fracture while patients 36% patients suffered an anterior superior iliac spine fracture. 93.2% underwent conservative treatment and 6.8% underwent surgery. Conclusions: The anterior iliac spine avulsions fractures are rare injuries that occur in young male athletes and the conservative option is the most selected treatment modality.


Subject(s)
Athletes/statistics & numerical data , Conservative Treatment/methods , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fractures, Avulsion/surgery , Ilium/injuries , Spinal Fractures/therapy , Adolescent , Age Factors , Child , Conservative Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Female , Fracture Fixation, Internal/statistics & numerical data , Fractures, Avulsion/epidemiology , Humans , Ilium/surgery , Incidence , Male , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Spinal Fractures/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness ; 59(3): 469-475, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29845833

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hamstring muscle injuries are common in the sports field, with lack of hamstring flexibility being a risk factor. Stretching the hamstring muscles is an important part of the training and rehabilitation programs used to prevent or treat injury and improve performance. We aim to compare the immediate and follow-up effect on hamstring muscle flexibility between 2 different stretching protocols, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching and PNF stretching combined with electrostimulation. A second aim is to determine whether physical activity level is related to flexibility. METHODS: Design of study: Single-blind, randomized controlled trial; Participants: 30 healthy volunteers (30 men, 18-39 years old); Intervention: A 6-session intervention program spanning over 2 weeks and 1-week and 3-week follow-up. The control group underwent PNF stretching with a voluntary contraction. The experimental group underwent PNF stretching but the muscle contraction was triggered with an electrical stimulation device (TENS); Main outcome measu: Hamstring muscles flexibility was assessed using the Modified Sit and Reach (MSR) and the Back Saver Sit and Reach (BSSR) tests. Physical activity level was evaluated with the short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). RESULTS: Both groups showed an overall increase in hamstring muscle flexibility. However, when comparing flexibility gain between baseline and the end of the stretching program (session 6), and at the 1-week and 3-week follow-ups, only the experimental group showed significant differences. No correlation between the IPAQ score and the degree of hamstring muscle flexibility was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Hamstring muscle PNF stretching combined with electrical stimulation to trigger muscle contraction during the muscle contraction phase of the stretch achieves better flexibility results when compared to PNF alone.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/rehabilitation , Electric Stimulation/methods , Hamstring Muscles/physiology , Muscle Stretching Exercises/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Male , Muscle Contraction/physiology , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Single-Blind Method , Young Adult
3.
Hip Int ; 29(4): 452-455, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30421629

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: 3D technology has increased popularity during the past decade due to recent advancements and has been described as a useful tool in several fields of medicine including orthopaedic surgery. Applications include preoperative planning, custom-made implants, patient-specific guides, etc. The aim of this study was to evaluate the similarity between 3D-printed models and cadaveric femoral heads, based on CT scans. METHODS: Cadaveric study of 12 male hips. Computed tomography (CT) was performed and through a semi-automatic segmentation process created the 3D model. Using a 3D printer, the model was printed in ABS plastic. 1 observer performed several measurements in the cadaver, and a 2nd observer performed the same measurements in the 3D-printed model. A 3rd observer compared both measurements and performed the statistical analysis. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the measurements of bony structures between the cadaveric specimens and the 3D-printed model (p > 0.05 in all cases). We found significant differences when comparing measurements containing a soft tissue element, for example the dimensions of the cartilage covered femoral head (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: 3D-printed models of the hip are accurate and feasible to the real bone and can thus be reliable for preoperative planning or other uses that may arise in orthopaedic surgery. Presence of cartilage must be considered when creating the 3D model from CT that considers bone but not cartilage.


Subject(s)
Femur , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Cadaver , Feasibility Studies , Femur/anatomy & histology , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Femur/surgery , Humans , Male , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...